Search for: "Ansul Company, The"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
Internal use by the proprietor does not suffice: Ansul at [37]; Verein [2009] ETMR 14 at [14]. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 2:00 pm
In all this, the Board did confirm that the sale of parts of vehicles can be the equivalent of vehicles if the use is genuine and not only ‘fit for the main product’ and the parties are of such nature that they can be considered to be produced by the same company and sufficiently important to be the equivalent of the vehicle. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:20 am
It does not include token use for the sole purpose of preserving the rights conferred by the mark (Ansul).4. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:45 pm
CA/L/369/2008: The Procter and Gamble Company v. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 2:33 am
Under the UK approach, the requirement is not merely to furnish a demographic survey showing that a majority of persons would attribute the shape of the goods to a single company. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Industrial Cleaning Equipment v Intelligent Cleaning Equipment [2023] EWHC 411 (IPEC) (February 2023)The case title might suggest this is a battle between two highly descriptive marks (ala Office Cleaning), but in fact both of these floor cleaning equipment companies had adopted the abbreviation ICE. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:38 am
(Please note that the OHIM’s applicants can by no means be compared to the shareholders of a private company. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:05 pm
Also, I am of the opinion that, given the very low genuine use threshold as applied by the ECJ in La Mer and Ansul / Ajax, the requirement of an international aspect cannot be maintained, considering the judgment of the ECJ in, among others, Pago. [read post]
